it is taking much longer than expected to translate the content
of the German website into English, the IAPE finds it important
that at least this text is translated and published on this website.
open word on the whole subject*:
darkfield-microscopy, the so called "diagnosis/therapy
by Enderlein" (Isopathic Treatment and remedies) with substances
made from mould-fungus-materials and other microbes, is widely
spread and used by many medical doctors and healing practitioners.
There are records of astonishing healing successes.
Dr. Günther Enderlein lived from 1872 till 1968. He was a
zoologist and a noted entomologist. Besides his
actual profession, he voluntarily worked as a bakteriologist
during World War I. At that time he was mainly working on the
cause of typhus fever (Rickettsiosis). Through this work
he found strange microparticles, while investigating the
blood of patients. They could only be witnessed through the use
of the darkfield-microcope. As he could not assign them to the
elements of blood known at that time, he was investigating their
true nature and origin. In those days there was a hightime of
microbiology, especially of the bacteriology and the, just starting,
field of virology. The whole world was looking for pathogenic
agents (for example Robert Koch (*1843 †1910), discoverer of the
tuberculosis-pathogen in 1882, dito cholera-pathogen 1883. Therefore
it was fair to assume for Enderlein, that these very small, strange
and unknown particles in the human blood were microbes (e.g. bacteria
and/or fungi, viruses). He and the scientists of that time did
not know much about viruses. He formulated a risky hypothesis:
Humans would have the mold-fungi 'Mucor recemosus Fresen'
and 'Aspergillus niger van Tieghem' as primeval-symbionts
inherent. These primeval-symbionts are essentially involved in
the development of allmost all endogen diseases. While with healthy
humans this primeval-symbionts (Enderlein gave them the name ENDOBIONTs)
emerges only in apathogenic form - i.e. non-pathogen -, they would
modify their form and characteristics and would become pathogenic
when humans live in a "nature-adverse-lifestyle". The development
of the 'Mucor recemosus Fresen' and 'Aspergillus niger van Tieghem'
inside the human can be wittnessed from the smallest, submicroscopic
size and level (< 0,1 µ without the existance of nucleic-acid
in it) through the level of the mon-nucleus primeval cell (Enderlein
called it the "Mychit" - with the existance of nucleic
acid in it), further through different stages of bacterial forms
and behavior to the upmost development thy mycel-state of the
fungus. This cycle of development with the destructing-phases
is called "the cyclogenia" or the cyclic development
of the symbionts. The cause of most chronic diseases would therefore
be attributed to the effect of the pathogenic forms and behavior
(bacterial and fungus-states) of these ENDOBIONTs. Now: when non-pathogene
forms and pathogene forms meet, then a sexual copulation may take
place, whereby one state of the non-pathogenic forms becomes a
sperm-cells-similar thing (Enderlein calls it "Spermite" - placed
on the level of the "mychit"). By this copulation the pathogenen
forms were reconverted into non-pathogene forms, their own early
development-states and humans again become healthier. This thought
led to the therapy with special mold-fungus-medicines - the so-called
>> Humans are supposed to have the
mold-fungi 'Mucor recemosus Fresen' and 'Aspergillus
niger van Tieghem' as primeval-symbionts inherent. These
primeval-symbionts are essentially involved in the development
of almost all endogenous diseases. While with healthy humans these
primeval-symbionts (Enderlein gave them the name ENDOBIONTs)
emerged only in apathogenic form - i.e. non-pathogenic -, they
were supposed to modify their form and characteristics and become
pathogenic, when humans lived in a "nature-adverse-lifestyle".
The development of the 'Mucor recemosus Fresen' and 'Aspergillus
niger van Tieghem' inside the human can be witnessed from the
smallest, submicroscopic size and level (< 0,1 µm without
the existence of nucleic acid in it) on through the level of the
mon-nucleus primeval cell (Enderlein called it the “Mychit” -
with the existence of nucleic acid in it), further on through
different stages of bacterial forms and behavior and finally to
the upmost development, the mycel-state of the fungus. The cause
of most chronic diseases could therefore be found in the pathogenic
forms and behavior (bacterial and fungus-states) of these ENDOBIONTs.
Now: when non-pathogenic forms and pathogenic forms meet, a sexual
copulation may take place, whereby one state of the non-pathogenic
form becomes a sperm-cell-similar being (Enderlein called it "Spermite"
- placed on the level of the “mychit”). Through this copulation
the pathogenic forms were reconverted into non-pathogenic forms,
their own early development forms, and humans again became healthier.
This thought led to the therapy with special mold-fungus-medicines
- the so called "Isopathic Treatment".<<
far a short interpretation of Enderlein's hypothesis, and
until today it remained a hypothesis. No attempt to proof
this hypothesis succeeded. On the other hand scientific discoveries
during the last 80 years succeeded in disproving many parts
of the Enderlein hypothesis! Indeed:
the most untenable part of the hypothesis is the "cyclogenic"
transformation of non-pathogenic virus-like-states into pathogenic
bacteria and of pathogenic bacteria into fungus (Mucor recemosus
Fresen) and the way back into non-pathogenic microorganisms or
fragments of it, what ever they would be. In
the age of molecular biology and genetics it is almost absurd
to maintain this part of the Enderlein hypothesis. The three areas
- viruses, bacteria and fungi - are completely independent from
each other; independent species with their own unique structures.
Even if there are some congruences in the genetic and/or phenotypic
structure of the organisms at some segments or aspects (e.g. ape
and human), the determinative and differentiating parts of the
genoma show the species unmistakable different from each other.
interpretation of the many, partly very impressive, phenomena
in the vital blood during the examination with a special darkfield-microscope
in the sense of the Enderlein-hypothesis is still being done by
many medical doctors and healing practitioners. Why? Because it
is taught so in many trainingcourses !! Usual courses on the "diagnosis
by Enderlein" and the "therapy by Enderlein", the so called 'Isopathic
Treatment', are taught by "teachers", who have never questioned
the subject of the teaching. Never did they proof the teachings
impartially and ask themselves, which parts of the teachings today,
in the 21st century, could still be maintained.
The reasons for this may be found in uncritical ignorance, perhaps
in the naďveté or in personal interests. Thus course participants
often get the impression that this is an ingenious scientific
discovery and that the most modern science "...finally acknowledges
the Enderlein-ideas and his hypothesis" (e.g. with the Prione-theory).
In fact, a religiously seeming framework is actually arranged
for them, which often enough is defended like it is done in a
religious war. Suddenly the uninformed course participant unexpectedly
finds him-/herself in the midst of an undesired situation. His/her
actual interest was to learn about a respectable way of diagnostics
and therapy for the well-being of his/her patients.
1996 the renowned physician and textbook author Dr.
med. Jost Dumrese, specialist for internal medicine, immunologist
and mykologist together with the swiss private scientist Bruno
Haefeli published the book "Pleomorphismus"
in the HAUG publishing house. In this 583-pages, lettersized
textbook the 200years study of the phenomena of the living
blood of humans is described. Many scientists and hobby-investigators
are named, acknowledged and their focus of research is explained.
This basic textbook does not want to add a further - personal
- interpretation of the findings in the microscope; on the contrary:
the large spectrum of the possibilities of interpretation expressed
so far is pointed out. The interested public, among them many
medical doctors and healing practitioners and in addition, their
patients, are vehementely requiring a scientific clarifying
of the phenomena and a clear, internationally accepted
interpretation and nomenclature of the findings.
to the estimate of the members of the former INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY
FOR PLEOMORPHISMOLOGY AND ENDOCYTOBIOLOGY - IAPE, as well as the
management of the INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED PLEOMORPHISMOLOGY AND
ENDOCYTOBIOLOGY - IAPE -, no interest exists on the side of most
"teachers" of the above described courses to learn the darkfield-microscopy.
Also, the pharmaceutical industry shows no interest at all
in the necessary clarifying of the contradictions and open questions,
connected with the topic. Some observers of the scene have the
opinion that those persons may in fact be anxious of such a kind
of scientific proof, because the results may lead to the point,
that the so far given interpretation of the findings in the living
blood, found with the darkfield-microscopy-method, as well as
the basic idea of the Isopathic Therapy is wrong.
1998, the IAPE formulated a catalog
of questions of the Pleomorphismology with more than 300
open, explosive questions, in which the extent of the ignorance
within this area is made clear. Every person that is interested
can request this catalog. Beyond that, the IAPE published a set
of publications, in which the current research, as well as appropriate
statements of the IAPE are made accessible to the public.
INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED PLEOMORPHISMOLOGY AND ENDOCYTOBIOLOGY -
IAPE - will carry on this work according to the available time,
power and possibilities. The technical equipment of the IAPE,
used to gain efficient results concerning the questions of this
field of investigation, are of high quality. Besides a modern
ZEISS-microscope for highest quality darkfield-microscopy of the
living blood, the IAPE uses different methods for coloration of
blood, ZEISS-fluorescence-microscopy and ZEISS-DIC (differentiated-interference-contrast).
Results are documented on videotapes, colorprints, computerfiles
and/or classical photographic media. Cooperation with highly equiped
scientific institutes ensure additional research and the control
of found results.
this homepage everybody can inform him-/herself about the aspects
and targets of the IAPE and should feel free to contact the institute
in case of any questions and/or suggestions.
Technical terms can be looked up in the glossary (soon available
in english languange,too).
Continue on to the german version of the homepage.